January 31, 2009

In response to my CC Card rant...

Here's a picture of a bunny to take the sting out:
Isn't it cute? Cute little bunny.

I won't post a gruesome picture, but when you think of the cute bunny, remember all the greedy rich bastards who want to kill the cute bunny, eat it, loan it some money, then charge them 20% interest for the privilege of having been eaten. Yeah.

Credit Card Bastards

Can you believe it? The rich folk screw up our economy by giving out ludicrously-high-risk loans (I'm simplifying, but you get the picture) and we, the common worker bee, get the shaft! Not only are our taxes paying for their greed, but now we get the double-shaft from the credit card companies. Two of my three credit card companies have jacked up the rates to ridiculous levels. 19.99% for one, 20.24% for the other! I've had these cards for decades, mostly because it supposedly looks good for credit scores. Screw that. I'm chopping them up and canceling the accounts. Fortunately I'm able to do so, what about the people who carry large amounts on their credit cards, and have no choice but to lube up their butt and go further into the hole with these interest rates? A bank could make some good money loaning money to people for the sole purpose of paying off credit cards. Friendly neighborhood bank could say "sure, we'll loan you $10,000 at 10%" and happy consumer could turn around and stick it right back to the credit card company! Happy consumer gets a halfway decent rate, credit card company gets counter-shafted. Everyone wins. Everyone, that is, who is not consumed with greed.

The government is, allegedly, trying to do something about it. Allegedly, there's a bill in Congress to prevent certain unsavory practices by credit card companies. The "universal default", for one. Heard of it? If you default on ANY loan, credit card, or just look funny at the mailman, the guilty credit card company can shoot you in the "default" interest category (30% is not uncommon)...even if you didn't default on their card! That's a kind of economic double-jeopardy if you ask me. Hopefully that bill passes in my lifetime.

I can only hope, that huge numbers of people will default on their credit cards, declare bankruptcy, whatever it takes to screw over the CC card companies. I'm tempted to buy a house with a credit card, default, declare bankruptcy, let the government (pardon me, become a communist and let my fellow taxpayers) bail me out and I can hide behind the gov'ments skirts in my fancy $1,000,000 mansion.

Join the fight! Either pay off and cancel that credit card, or default!

January 17, 2009

I freaking love SRAM

Yes, yes it's true. After 20 years of rolling primarily on Shimano components, I've officially been seduced by the SRAM road components. Mostly Rival, because of the lost-cost high-performance combination - though I do still favor the Red shifters for the Zero-Loss shifter on the back.
It's true, Shimano shifters are smoother. And some people pledge their lives to Campagnolo...though I could never adapt to the thumb shifter. But my first ride with SRAM's upstart Double Tap system won me over. It took precisely two shifts for the new system to become intuitive, and my favorite by far. Exactly one upshift, and one downshift. BAM! Sold. Shimano had a good idea, but using the brake lever to shift? Wonky, but good enough until SRAM came along with the ultimate non-electric mechanism. The SRAM brakes eat Shimano for breakfast. The front shifting, even on a compact setup, is nearly as good as shifting at the back. Like nothing I've ever experienced before.

Granted, I've never ridden with top-of-the-line Dura-Ace (except for the old-style downtube shifters), nor spent a lot of time on Campagnolo. But the Double Tap system alone is enough to woo me away from both of the ancient brands.

I sometimes wonder if maybe I should feel at least a little guilty. Shimano has always treated me well. They function properly, hardly ever fail at critical moments, tens of thousands of miles have rolled by under my wheels, controlled by Shimano components. But I don't. Feel bad at all. It's a dog-eat-dog world out there, Shimano, and you've got to keep up. Your engineers should have been busy trying out whole new shifting paradigms, rather than sitting on their laurels and complacently shaving a few grams off year by year.

Electronic shifting, you ask? Yeah...that will be interesting. It's an intriguing idea. Half of me scoffs and wonders "How lazy can you be?". The other half...the half that works on precision electromechanical gadgets all day...raises an eyebrow and says "Yeah, push-button shifting might be cool." Needless to say, with two halves of me at odds, I can sometimes look funny. One side scowling, the other with curiously-raised brow.

For time-trials and triathlons (which are really just time-trials with some silly running and swimming thrown in for no apparent reason) it's a no-brainer. Go strap some monstrously expensive electronic shifters on those ridiculously expensive aero bars. You've already dropped over $10k on the bike, another few thousand for the components won't break the bank. Now you can shift without disturbing your carefully calibrated airflow, and also shift while on the bullhorns. And your fingers might be cold from that bizarre business with the water, so pressing a button will be easier then moving a lever, right?

One thing I would like to see is a teeny-tiny - say 5 watts - generator charging up a capacitor to run the derailers. No batteries. If the weight can be kept down, and the recharge time short enough... That would retain the freedom and self-contained wonder of bicycling...with the marvel of push-button shifting. Ideally I think a capacitor with...er, capacity...to perform four or five shifts on a charge, and maybe 10 seconds to fully recharge...that would do the trick. If you need more shifting than that, you should reevaluate your riding technique. Check it out Shimano. And get on with it, SRAM. Like I said, it's a dog-eat-dog world, you have to keep up.

Sadly, only one of my road bikes currently has SRAM components. All the others slouch dejectedly against the wall, jealously eyeing the 22-year-old frame and its fancy new components:

January 15, 2009

Chocolate milk, bad driving

I was talking with my brother about his new hill-climb workout, and the nastiness of his chosen recovery drink. I mentioned to him that chocolate milk had some fame as an excellent recovery drink, and he was quite excited at the prospect of a non-bile-tasting post-workout drink. Being the good brother that I am, I did a little internet research to find out if there'd been any new developments, as the initial "pro milk" reports appeared around 2006. Didn't find any, but I still like chocolate milk after a good bike ride. I'm not Lance Armstrong, my career doesn't depend on optimal recovery...but a some carbs, a little protein, and a whole lot of cold deliciousness really hits the spot after a long, hot ride.

In the course of my research, I came across an amazingly foolish comment from a doctor on some random website about the "evils" of dairy products. He was touting a dairy-free diet, claiming anecdotal evidence, and stating that "humans are the only species who seek out and consume the milk of other species".

Now on the face of it, this may seem like a reasonable thing to say. Sure, it's a little icky, drinking milk that came from a giant cud-chewing, methane-spewing poop machine. But thinking a little more about this statement, the absurdness of it becomes apparent. We also happen to be the only species with fire, who cooks their food. Does this doctor want us all to go to an all-raw, all-the-time diet? Not that I'm aware of. We're the only species that puts on clothes to stay warm and avoid freezing to death. Does the good doctor want us all to be nudists, even in Antarctica? Probably not. How about surgery to extend the length and quality of our lives, taking vitamins, exercise that's not involved in running down food, written language, giant frontal cortexes...does the doc want us to revert to a pre-fire caveman existence and perform frontal labotamies with rocks? I think you see my point. Just because something is different from everything or everyone else, is not necessary and sufficient reason to stop doing it.Which leads me to another point. Logic, and the lack therof. Back when I was in school, they taught us "critical thinking". It was the educational rage at the time. Rather than rote memorization of vast numbers of facts - though there was some of that too - some lessons focused on thinking about things, and finding answers for ourselves. I thought that was quite a fine thing to teach. Do they still do that? I don't know. Did the vast majority of my fellow citizens sleep through those exercises? It would appear so. Most advertisements, get-rich-quick schemes, idiots telling us not to drink milk...many of these become ridiculous if you stop to think about them for a second. Sadly, it appears a sizable portion of our population falls for these schemes. At least enough of a portion to make it worthwhile. Perhaps their schools did not teach the progressive "critical thinking" skills, or they slept through them, or were too busy chasing cheerleaders.

On a completely different note, driving. Those of you who know me hopefully view me as a pretty mellow guy except when I see injustice, and bad - that is, blatantly unsafe - driving. Someone driving fast, with skill, in a safe area is fine. No problem. Someone driving fast, passing around a blind corner over the crest of a hill in a school zone during a snowstorm; that enrages me. I saw two accidents on the short 10 miles between work and home (I took a detour to warm up the car a bit). Both were incidents involving a car on a main road, and another car slamming into them while entering the road via a right-hand turn. Good visibility, dry roads...no explanation for the crash except for "I didn't see them." Or more likely, "I didn't bother to look." More and more people don't seem to actually stop before making a right turn. They zoom up, assuming they will be able to continue and not wanting to slow down. At the last moment, if they see a car (a.k.a. obstacle) out of the corner of their eye, they slam on the brakes with their car's snout hanging tantalizingly into the lane. Is it REALLY so FREAKING HARD to lose maybe 10 seconds to slow down and actually look at the lane you want to merge into? Are these people in that much of a hell-for-leather rush? Will people DIE if you are a few minutes later getting to your destination? If not, stop driving like an idiot. Because people WILL DIE when you slam your car into them. Or, more convincingly, YOU WILL DIE when someone does the same thing to you (or your wife, daughter, son, mother, father, dog, or canary). Get a clue. It's not a racetrack.

January 10, 2009

2009 Racing Season just around the bend...

Lance Armstrong's first professional road race since announcing his return is just a couple of weeks away, the Tour Down Under (in Australia, hello) starts January 18th. The world of cycling and LA fans will be watching him carefully, and no doubt there will be millions of commentaries and opinions about his fitness and chances to win an 8th Tour de France come July.

Speaking of which, this year's Tour de France will be interesting. The route (though old news) includes a first-time-ever mountain finish the day before the final stage. Stage 20 will finish atop Mont Ventoux...a stage Lance has never won, let alone coming at the very end of the Tour and after a 3-year retirement!Also, the team time trail is back! This action-packed display of just how fast a team of professional cyclists working together can go is not to be missed.Overall, it will be a tension-filled, nail-biting season. With Astana boasting FOUR top contenders for the Tour (Contador, Levi the Wheelsucker, Kloden, and Armstrong), the contention for team leader will be ferocious. Not to mention Garmin-Chipotle making the rounds abroad, Hincapie not riding in support of Lance since he's on Team Columbia...should be fun.

Doping controls will no doubt be so tight the riders will be dehydrated from constant urine-sample donations, and low on blood from hourly blood samples. I will not be surprised to see riders peeing into cups and having blood taken while actually riding! And no doubt there will be some who fail the test. Some legitimately cheating, others just the victim of crappy French laboratories and loose-lipped bastards. Yeah, I don't like how rider's rights are routinely violated. "Joe X failed his A sample test. Sure I'm not supposed to tell you until he also fails the B sample test and the rider and team has been notified...but I'm French! I'll do what I want! Rider careers be damned, I am an important Frenchman! Bow down to me!!!!"Uh...ok...I'm not bitter. Hopefully the governing bodies in question (you know who you are, and you also know who you are) will be better behaved this year. It will certainly be a first. I especially enjoy this quote, from Dick Pound, speaking of Floyd Landis' failed test in the 2006 Tour de France: "Pound declared 'I mean, it was 11 to 1!' referring to the testosterone-to-epitestosterone level. 'You’d think he’d be violating every virgin within 100 miles. How does he even get on his bicycle?'[13]" Now there, ladies and gentlemen, is a man of refinement, sophistication, and sensitivity.

I know I will be glued to the TV/computer for the 2009 Tour Down Under. How about you?

January 8, 2009

Shooting at work today...


Yes, that's right. A woman was shot in the foot while at work today. They locked us down for three hours while the police, SWAT, and a police helicopter searched the area for the shooter. Never did find him. For about the first hour, Security wasn't telling anyone what was happening, then finally they made an announcement about why we couldn't leave, and why the cops, SWAT, and helicopter were swarming over the 300-acre grounds of our campus. Needless to say the interweb news outlets let us know there was a shooting, but no details. We were afraid it was a Columbine-style random killing spree. While I feel bad for the wounded-foot woman, I'm glad it was an isolated incident and not a going-Postal type rampage. Fortunately I was in my bunker of an office, surrounded by cinder blocks, concrete, and a restricted-access door to cower behind.

Quite surprising to be calmly eating lunch with your coworkers, and hear an engimatic announcement come over the PA: "This is a security emergency. Please take shelter where you are and await further announcements. Do not move around the building or go outside." Usually those PA announcements are for PA system tests, fire drills, notification of sprinkler system service, and the like. My first security emergency.

I wonder if my employer will offer us hazard pay to continue reporting to our apparently high-risk campus. And apparently the "No Firearms" policy is more of a suggestion than a rule.
I would not be surprised if metal detectors appear and random searches begin. And for God's sake secure the perimeter of the site! I frequently go cross-country to shorten my walk to work. No camera coverage, no fences...anyone could stroll onto the site from the street. Not that I work in a high-crime area, but I can do without a terrorist army strolling in, taking over the campus, and turning it into their own private terrorist fortress.

Maybe Security should install one of these on the roof:
That will give the bad guys second thoughts...

January 7, 2009

Arch-nemesis strikes again!

Well, I thought I'd take tomorrow and Friday off, to make up for having to work on my arch-nemesis the ever-broken robot. Turns out, the arch-nemesis robot is going to have the last laugh. Guess what? Yep, broken! So I will be returning to work when I should be enjoying some nice time off. It would be a shame if somehow the robot found itself in...oh I don't know...a lake of fire where it belongs!!!

January 5, 2009

Of walking and bone density

I have weak shin bones. Always have. So I started walking to work, in the hope that the mild impact would inspire them to be stronger. It worked! The first few days I had some ferocious shin splints, easily recognized from my days running track (400m). Over the Christmas break, I went about 1.5 weeks without significant walking, being off work and all.
So today I was back to work, and walked in. Shins are sore. Do my shins really lose mass that quickly?!?! Shocking. By the way, that is not my leg. My leg is much longer and better-looking. That leg is short and stumpy. Plus my leg has cool scars. Chicks dig scars, right?

So needless to say I will continue my walking adventures, and my semi-regular consumption of yogurt and calcium supplements, in the hope that my leg bones will not waste away to the point that I am hobbling along on toothpick-like bony stumps.

January 3, 2009

Tough choices...

As I contemplate a carbon bike purchase later in the year, I've mostly narrowed it down to three choices. The Trek Madone, Orbea Onix, or the Cervelo RS. The Trek is probably out because I don't like any of their paint schemes this year, and it's expensive. The Orbea is nice. The Cervelo is the current leader, but expensive. The RS has nice geometry that I think will fit better, and I like how they post all that engineering jargon on their site. Plus if their production frames can survive under Fabian Cancellera in Paris-Roubaix, it can survive my enormous mass. He is heavy (195lbs.?) and powerful (sustained 550 watts for 5 kilometers). I am heavier (?) and way less powerful (10 watts for 5 meters, followed by a nap).
Ideally, I would get the RS geometry with the R3's straight seat stays. But who am I to be picky? It would of course be built with my patented SRAM Red/Rival component blend. That is, Red shifters and Rival everything else. Although the new Rival shifters are said to have zero-loss travel and trim, just like Red, so maybe all Rival, all the time. Probably some nice Easton wheels. Though I do like the reflective stickers on ROL wheels...

Why am I not looking at, say, the S3? I don't generally ride fast enough to need lots of aero goodies, I don't race, and the giant airfoil frame just doesn't look pretty to me. Mostly it's aesthetics.

Choices.

January 2, 2009

My toes, they are cold

It was one of those borderline temperature days. Mid 40-s, light wind, perfect biking weather! I was out for two hours, starting to get a little oomph back in the legs which is nice. Trouble is, it's not cold enough to bust out the Lake winter cycling clogs, and my shoe covers were shredded last year. Needless to say, despite my wool socks my toes got quite cold. The rest of my foot? Fine, thanks for asking. Just the toes! Cycling shoes are generally made to pass lots of air through to keep you cool...not much good in January, though. Tomorrow, bike shop for shoe covers. And I need a new ratchet for one shoe...it's getting a little reluctant to let my foot out.

Pictures!

Here's a picture of my niece, "M". At four months, she's already begun a rigorous sit-up routine to keep her core strong:

And here's a shot of the two "brothers". The original bike on your left, the modern reincarnation "Velotron" on your right. My original bike has sadly been stripped of it's tires and pedals by mysterious cannibals. Velotron currently has massive 48cm wide handlebars on it. Thought I'd give 'em a try. They are monstrously wide...time will tell if I like them or switch to a more normal width handlebar. I do seem to breathe deeper, though I'm sure the aerodynamics are suffering. Decisions...
And no, that's not an optical illusion. My nose really is that big*! I will never by stranded at sea, because my nose doubles as a very efficient sail. Oddly enough, even with such a huge honker, I can't hardly smell anything. Irony: I has it!

And finally, this saddle should bring back memories for the old-timers:
Velotron has a NOS Turbo saddle. Unfortunately, the one with world champion (?) stripes cost roughly twice as much, so Velotron is lacking the full color effect. Still comfy, though.

*Amusing footnote: Several years ago I had my sinuses roto-rooted. The surgeon subtly mentioned to me that he's also a cosmetic surgeon, and could trim my nose down a bit while he was in there. No thank you, my nose may be getting bigger every year, but I like it! Scares the pigeons away. And if a bear attacks me, all I have to do is turn sideways to present my nose in profile, and it will surely flee in terror.

2009. "Time is the fire in which we burn."

Some Star Trek movie had that line it it. Tru dat. And apparently stolen from this poem. I'm no poetry critic, but it's a good one. All my life I've been keenly aware of the passage of time. Dunno why, makes me morbid sometimes. Gets me off the couch other times...


Yep...2009. Just got a notice of my 20-year high school reunion...in 2010. 20 years since high school? Hard to believe. The grey hair is awfully convincing, though. Lucky for me, I've got a nice job, a bitchin' wagon, abundant bikes, and of course cycling keeps you young. Didn't you know?

So I've started up the interval training on the pesky indoor trainer. Sadly, my cheapie trainer starts clunking pretty bad when the power goes up over 60%. Bottom bracket races are shot. What I need is a new trainer, this one is ancient.

I've also been thinking about carbon bike frames. Yes, I love my steel steeds...but I figure I ought to give carbon a shot, right? Everyone loves it! Planes are made out of it! It's true my enormous mass may shatter a carbon frame to splinters the moment I sit on it, or my gargantuan legs may tear the bottom bracket right out of the frame...but there's only one way to find out. And I've seen bigger guys riding Madones...so it must be possible. Maybe as a reward for reaching some cycling milestone this year, yeah that's the ticket.

So what's the word? Will a 6'4" 225lb. mash-machine turn a carbon frame into a shrapnel cloud of splinters? Should I wear armored chamois in case the seat post disintegrates under me? Orbea makes a nice frame with suitable geometry...hmmmm....